A U.S. District Court Judge in Arizona has ordered the National Labor Relations Board’s Regional Director in Phoenix, acting on behalf of the Board, to pay $55,000 in attorneys’ fees to an employer sued for a temporary injunction over the firing of four recently hired employees, despite awarding the Regional Director much of the relief he sought in his application for relief under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act.

The case involved a union organizing campaign at a recently acquired company.  After purchasing the company, the new owner contacted the Department of Homeland Security and was informed that he could treat all employees as new hires and, therefore, use E-Verify to verify their legal authorization to work in the U.S., as is required by Arizona law.  When he fired four of his “new hires,” the General Counsel alleged that the terminations were unlawful because they were motivated by the employees’ support for the union.  The Regional Director also filed an action under Section 10(j) of Labor-Management Relations Act in federal district court in Arizona against the employer seeking , among other things,  the immediate reinstatement of the four terminated employees pending a final determination by the NLRB in the underlying unfair labor practice proceeding.

The Court granted the Regional Director’s application, in part, noting that, “Employees get the message when their employer fires the union sympathizers among them.”  However, the Court would not agree to the Regional Director’s demand that the discharged employees be reinstated and be exempt from the employer’s lawful and non-discriminatory use of the federal E-Verify system.  Significantly, the employer had offered to reinstate the four employees conditioned upon their successful completion of the E-Verify.  The Court found the Regional Director’s insistence that the employees be retained even if they could not be confirmed as legally authorized to work under E-Verify was contrary to the law.

After receiving the Court’s ruling, the employer filed a motion for an award of attorneys’ fees based on legal costs the employer had incurred in resisting the Regional Director’s insistence on the employees’ unconditional rehire.  The Court granted the employer’s request and awarded it attorneys’ fees in the amount of $55,739.

This case should serve as a reminder to Regional Directors and the NLRB’s General Counsel that despite broad prosecutorial discretion, they cannot    overreach during unfair labor practice charge administrative proceedings, related court proceedings and settlement negotiations.  Although it is rare for a court to award attorneys’ fees as happened in this case, employers should be aware that they have the option to request them in egregious cases and, perhaps, to remind Board officials of that in appropriate circumstances.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Howard M. Bloom Howard M. Bloom

Howard M. Bloom is a Principal in the Boston, Massachusetts, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He has practiced labor and employment law representing exclusively employers for more than 36 years.

Mr. Bloom counsels clients in a variety of industries on labor law issues.

Howard M. Bloom is a Principal in the Boston, Massachusetts, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He has practiced labor and employment law representing exclusively employers for more than 36 years.

Mr. Bloom counsels clients in a variety of industries on labor law issues. He trains and advises executives, managers and supervisors on union awareness and positive employee relations, and assists employers in connection with union card-signing efforts, traditional union representation and corporate campaigns, and union decertification campaigns. He also represents clients at the National Labor Relations Board in connection with bargaining unit issues, objections and challenges, as well as unfair labor practice investigations and trials. Mr. Bloom also has been the spokesperson at countless first and successor contract collective bargaining negotiations, and regularly advises on collective bargaining agreement administration issues, including grievance/arbitration issues.

Mr. Bloom has appeared before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, several U.S. District Courts, the National Labor Relations Board, the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination.

Mr. Bloom speaks frequently to employer groups on a wide range of labor and employment law topics. He also has written extensively on labor and employment law for a variety of publications, including New England Business magazine, The Boston Globe and the Boston Business Journal. He also is editor of and a frequent contributor to the Jackson Lewis Labor & Collective Bargaining Blog.

While attending law school, he was the Executive Editor of The Advocate: the Suffolk University Law School Journal and President of the Student Bar Association.

Mr. Bloom is a diehard baseball fan. His first book, The Baseball Uncyclopedia: A Highly Opinionated Myth-Busting Guide to the Great American Game, was published in February 2006.

Photo of Philip B. Rosen Philip B. Rosen

Philip B. Rosen is a Principal in the New York City office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and a member of the Firm’s Management Committee. Mr. Rosen also leads the firm’s Labor Practice Group. He joined the Firm in 1979 and served as Managing…

Philip B. Rosen is a Principal in the New York City office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and a member of the Firm’s Management Committee. Mr. Rosen also leads the firm’s Labor Practice Group. He joined the Firm in 1979 and served as Managing Partner of the New York City office from 1989 to 2009.

Mr. Rosen lectures extensively, conducts management training, and advises clients with respect to legislative and regulatory initiatives, corporate strategies, business ethics, social media, reorganizations and reductions-in-force, purchase/sale transactions, sexual harassment and other workplace conduct rules, compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, wrongful discharge and other workplace litigation, corporate campaigns and union organizing matters, collective bargaining, arbitration and National Labor Relations Board proceedings. He has been quoted by the press on many labor matters, including the National Labor Relations Board’s recent initiatives on protected concerted activity and the proposed Notice Posting requirements.